Pages

Friday, July 24, 2009

Liberalism is a Bankrupt Monster

Conservatism is a shining city on the hill. Liberalism is the clanking monster that threatens to destroy it.

Christopher Chantrill has written a brilliant piece contrasting two opposing views on what American conservatives should do to improve their lot. Our conservative friend from Canada, David Warren says to start the revolution. British liberal Daniel Finkelstein recommends throwing Sarah Palin and the other lowbrows over the side and buddying up to the liberal media.

Read Chantrill's article here: Who's Out of Touch. Here is an excerpt that neatly summarizes his thesis:
The awful truth about liberalism is its central delusion, the notion that life can be neatly organized into rational bureaucratic programs. It turns everything it touches into a soulless clanking monster.

The glorious truth about conservatism is its love of life. Before princes, principalities and powers comes life and love, mothers and babies, children and families, struggle and sacrifice, a city on a hill.

8 comments:

Canadian Pragmatist said...

liberalism doesn't believe that "life can be neatly organized into rational bureaucratic programs" but that life could be made better and easier for the less fortunate if we try.

This is just classic mis-characterization of the other side. And how are gov't programs soulless. This is just propoganda. There is no meaningful content in any of this.

Silverfiddle said...

Maybe Canadian liberalism doesn't believe it, but Progressive American liberalism sure does. 20th century history bears this out: A program to cure every ill and wipe away every tear. What do we have to show for it? A debt that will one day sink us.

Of course government programs are soulless, by definition.

Canadian Pragmatist said...

People are soulless as well. That is just to say they are not supernatural, so I will easily concede that gov't programs are not supernatural. I don't know of any private institutions that are either. Big deal. It's written as if this is a great criticism. It's meaningless.

History doesn't bear it out. No one has said "well solve all the countries problems with gov't programs". This idea that liberalism is so idealistic is just senseless.

It's idealistic in that it has ideals, or goals to which liberal politicians strive (ending poverty, etc...) but it is not that they have ending poverty institutions. All they do is try and create jobs when people are out of work and raise the minimum wage so that everyone who works is not living in poverty.

These are not even really high standards. It is only compared to your standards of gov't that these are high hopes.

Again, the excerpt is just meaningless. It's a soundbite. "Soulless," it's literally namecalling, but at least when I call Palin a moron it is both true, and means something like ergo she cannot run a country.

Silverfiddle said...

You need to read some American history, my friend. It's so much easier to call Sarah Palin names, though.

There is something profound, even sublime in screwing yourself by some dumb decision you made. You learn from it, and come out wiser on the other side.

When a government screws you, in some clumsy act of benevolence gone awry, you're just plain screwed.

Canadian Pragmatist said...

Another sound-bite my friend.

It is easier to call Palin names because she deserves each and every one of them.

She is republicanism though. Get into gov't screw it all up and then blame the gov't for screwing things up.

Silverfiddle said...

Well, we're in the realm of opinion now, and you're entitled to yours.

I just expected more from you, like maybe some facts to back the name-calling.

For example, you could call her a quitter and you'd be correct. Based on her before and after McCain, you could make a case she has swerved rightward in a brazen attempt to win over red-blooded voters. You could even accuse her of being a bad mother...

Oh well. You should also stop falling for the Democrats vs Republican game. Both parties have cooperated to flush this country down the toilet

Canadian Pragmatist said...

Yah, both parties are flushing the country down the drain and yet you criticize the left exclusively on your blog.

The names I call her encompass all that. She's a moron. I'll stick with that thank you.

AMIT said...

Really a interesting and worth reading post.Thanks for posting.

Lawyer directory

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.