Obama's Peace Prize, Global Warming, and Other Fantasies

Obama's Peace Prize is really about getting the US to pass cap and trade and then sign on to a disastrous climate change treaty this December

Here come the scolding mommies from Europe, demanding we "Do Something!" in response to their incomprehensible fairy tales about global warming making Mother Earth hot and mad ...

Delegates wrap up two weeks of talks in Thailand tomorrow in an effort to replace or extend the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, whose emission limits for industrialized nations expire in 2012.

Failure (of the US) to have a new law in time for Copenhagen’s final round of negotiations would raise question marks over what commitments the U.S. can make, Falkenberg said.

Note the arch, scolding, passive/aggressive tone these internationales use:

Oct. 8 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. President Barack Obama faces “more than an embarrassment” should his nation fail to lead international negotiations to complete a new climate-protection treaty by December, a senior European climate negotiator said.

“Obama and his administration are very committed, and it will be more than an embarrassment for them if at Copenhagen they would have to admit they are not ready,” Falkenberg said late last night in Bangkok, where more than 180 nations are meeting for talks.

“We can just help, but helping them also means directly telling them that the world has an expectation.”

I don't like the pompous tone from these little pissant busybodies!  Nobody talks to the US President like that, and we sure as hell don't care about "the world's" expectations.

I was getting really angry reading this piece, until I came across this laugher:

The UN is pushing for a deal that would limit the rise in world temperatures since industrialization began to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit).

A deal on limiting the earth's temperature?  Who do they propose to negotiate this with?  Old Man Winter?  Mother Nature? The sun?  

The International House of Scandal and Corruption and the polyglot dingleberries who cling to it can't even agree on a what constitutes terrorism or a human rights abuse.  Yet they propose to turn down the earth's thermostat?  

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!

Finally, the article hints there is hope:

Obama’s scope is limited because the U.S. Congress may not approve a domestic law to control emissions before the December deadline for signing an international climate accord...

Bloomberg - Climate Change Nonsense