Oh, so witty CP... you implied that I was a child... need I say more?
Okay, Joseph Alois Ratzinger (Who is Pope Benedict not Ratzinger by the way) was a member of the Hitler youth... I have wiki too:
"Following his 14th birthday in 1941, Ratzinger was conscripted in the Hitler Youth, as membership was required for all 14-year old German boys after December 1939,"
Let me finish the sentence: "but was an unenthusiastic member and refused to attend meetings."
in addition to wikipedia, here is the source article:
You lying liberal progagandist, Goebbels would be proud of you.
More to the point, Thanks! Your snide comment supports my statement that government and politics should not be involved with children more than it detracts from it. Thanks for the support!
Well, OK there CP... or perhaps I should say CCCP?
The federal government has no business teaching our kids - the camel's nose under the tent began with federal funding of public schools. Now our kids are subjected to Hollywood types "pledging to be servants to Obama".
CP, you stumbled onto a blog created by ex-military types who swore an oath to the Constitution, not a loyalty oath to a mere man.
Hitler and Stalin required loyalty oaths to themselves and also groomed children to be fodder for the next war. We don't want that in America and willing to use ridicule to stop it. Pray we don't go farther.
There you go again, mischaracterizing my position. I do not want to ban the speech. I hope he keeps talking. The more he talks the worse it gets for him and his Bolshies.
I also think conservatives with school children are overreacting. It's a speech. My kids will watch it and then they'll entertain their friends afterward by sarcastically lampooning it.
Freedom is speech is beautiful, and it goes both ways.
The point is that public schools should be politically neutral. I have no objections to a civics lesson... so tell me, who is the counterpoint speaker to Obama?
15 comments:
:O. That's awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!
So then why are you so political Finntann?
Among the "jungen" who admired Hitler like the girl in the poster was Pope Ratzinger.
This isn't a criticism of children, but of adults who indoctrinate them into a cult of personality.
Stick around, you may learn something
Oh, so witty CP... you implied that I was a child... need I say more?
Okay, Joseph Alois Ratzinger (Who is Pope Benedict not Ratzinger by the way) was a member of the Hitler youth... I have wiki too:
"Following his 14th birthday in 1941, Ratzinger was conscripted in the Hitler Youth, as membership was required for all 14-year old German boys after December 1939,"
Let me finish the sentence:
"but was an unenthusiastic member and refused to attend meetings."
in addition to wikipedia, here is the source article:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-04-23-new-pope-defied-Nazis_x.htm
You lying liberal progagandist, Goebbels would be proud of you.
More to the point, Thanks! Your snide comment supports my statement that government and politics should not be involved with children more than it detracts from it. Thanks for the support!
Sure.
The pope was an unenthusiastic member of the Hitler youth. That was big of him.
Well, OK there CP... or perhaps I should say CCCP?
The federal government has no business teaching our kids - the camel's nose under the tent began with federal funding of public schools. Now our kids are subjected to Hollywood types "pledging to be servants to Obama".
CP, you stumbled onto a blog created by ex-military types who swore an oath to the Constitution, not a loyalty oath to a mere man.
Hitler and Stalin required loyalty oaths to themselves and also groomed children to be fodder for the next war. We don't want that in America and willing to use ridicule to stop it. Pray we don't go farther.
Well said, Anon. You summed it up nicely. Thanks!
CP stay out of this one
GWB the first did the same thing.
Oh, does that conflict with your nut-bag political narrative?
GWB? Who's that? As anon said, our allegiance is to the constitution, no some goomer who happens to occupy the white house.
Typical response of a hope smoking cultist...
So, you're not for presidential speeches to children at all. You're for banning them altogether. That's very constitutional.
There you go again, mischaracterizing my position. I do not want to ban the speech. I hope he keeps talking. The more he talks the worse it gets for him and his Bolshies.
I also think conservatives with school children are overreacting. It's a speech. My kids will watch it and then they'll entertain their friends afterward by sarcastically lampooning it.
Freedom is speech is beautiful, and it goes both ways.
The point is that public schools should be politically neutral. I have no objections to a civics lesson... so tell me, who is the counterpoint speaker to Obama?
Like I said.
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.