Pages

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

A Lesson in Civility

The Obama inauguration can teach us a valuable lesson in civility; it was unmarred by right-wing protests. With the exception of that notorious group from Kansas, the transfer of power was graceful and more importantly civil, at least from the right. Of course people in the crowd booed when Bush's image was flashed on jumbo-trons and one contingent near the Capitol sang "Na-na-na-na, hey, hey, goodbye" in a jeering farewell. President George W. Bush was booed lustily by the crowd in front of the platform. Fortunately, they at least appeared to be a minority.

Is this the way your mother taught you to behave? Would she be proud of you? If there is anything worse than a sore loser, it is a sore winner; it speaks volumes when you can’t even win graciously. A brief glance over an assortment of Dick Cheney wheelchair stories reveals such a plethora of vitriolic comments that it sickens me to read. Ranging from “Doctor Strangelove” to “Well maybe we’ll get lucky and he’ll roll off the stage” and those are some of the more decent ones. Listen to your President:
“We come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics,” he declared.
Perhaps he wasn’t just talking about the Republicans; perhaps our new President is just better and more decent than some of those of his party he was elected to represent. Heed the words of our first President:
“Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally. This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism.
Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it. It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the government and serve to keep alive the spirit of liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in governments of a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume."
~George Washington~
I, a Conservative, Republican, American, wish our (my) new President well; for after all, our fates are intertwined, are they not? To wish the President well is to wish America well. To the nasty, gleeful, jeering children that taunt and scoff at our outgoing President, I urge you... Grow Up! To the petulant and bitter who claim he is not "My President"... Leave. For in your bitterness you deny the basic democratic principles upon which our great nation is founded. If he's not your President... then you must not be an American... for, like it or not,Barrack Hussein Obama is President of the United States of America.

Undoubtedly there will be issues upon which we disagree, and just as undoubtedly there will issues we will agree upon. I will, when in disagreement, oppose in defense of my principles, but rationally, civilly, and with respect. When in agreement, I will be man enough to admit it and not oppose simply out of spite, and will give credit where credit is due. When defeated I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and give your policies a chance to work, when victorious, I will not gloat. For those of my party and political persuasion who find fault with the opposition, lead by example. Partisanship must end!

I call to those members of all parties who believe that rational, civil, and intellectual discourse is the foundation of democracy to shun those who resort to childish behavior, rebuke them, do not allow them to be 'the voice' of your party. It demeans the parties, the principles, the positions, and this great nation.

Long Live the Republic and the President of these great United States of America.

~Finntann~

5 comments:

Russell said...

"When defeated I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and give your policies a chance to work..."

i guess it would be unseemly to point out that most of what i think the new president has in store for us has already been tried before, unsuccessfully i might add.

oh, and you can wish for partisanship to end all you want, but it never will (take a gander at what the dems think about ending partisanship: booing bush, putting bush & cheney on trial, etc). the problem with our current brand of partisanship is that both sides are essentially the same thing. sure there are some clear differences, but the truth is there isn't a dimes worth of difference between the two major parties. so no matter which side wins these partisan debates and fights, the people are guaranteed to lose.

i do agree that our futures are intertwined, and thus i hope i'm wrong, and that our new president can turn around our dire situation. but i wouldn't bet on it.

Finntann said...

Yes, but wouldn't it be nice if both adult Democrats and Republicans told the nut jobs hiding under their banners to STFU?

And by both, I don't mean two... oh wait a minute... maybe...

Oh come on there has got to be more than two?

Cheers!

Anonymous said...

Partisanship is not the problem. Its a symptom of the problem.

The fundamental problem is one of increasingly polar opposite world views inside a supposed nation of one. Seeing these two trains heading for one another on the same track, and expecting human beings to shout niceties out the windows to each other is to deny human nature.

There is no question which train is the aggressor as it slowed to a stop on these tracks and changed directions in the past 40 years. We only have to read the words of supposed opposition heroes like JFK or even Hubert Humphrie to deduce something has gone quickly and terribly awry.

We got immoral lunatics gunning straight for us and the greatest success of human liberty the world has ever known. We can pretend its all just a problem of civil discourse that we somehow can control. But that doesn't make it go away.

SteveH

Silverfiddle said...

Read "The 5000 Year Leap" and you will really see how far we have gotten from the founding principles of this country.

Finntann said...

You have a very good point Steve, but I tend to think both parties are being hijacked by a bunch of loud mouthed idiots who get press coverage because, well the media likes a scene.

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.